The reason stale price sheets circulate for years is that nothing in a WhatsApp group carries a date. A file forwarded eleven times looks identical to the one issued yesterday, and the first anyone knows is when a buyer is quoted a price that no longer exists.
| Asset | Issued | Status | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price sheet | 12 September 2026 | Current | Generated from the system of record |
| Payment schedules, all three floors | 12 September 2026 | Current | Every instalment, with running totals |
| Availability | 12 September 2026 | Current | Rebuilt when inventory changes |
| Approval letter | — | Not issued | Awaiting the scan |
| Architectural floor plans | — | Not issued | Awaiting the drawings |
| Renders | — | Not issued | Not produced |
| Site photographs | — | Not issued | Monthly, once construction is logged |
| Printable brochure | — | Not issued | Will match this website exactly |
How to use this
- Before a meeting, open this page and check the issue date against whatever is on your phone.
- If they differ, use this one and delete the other. Do not keep both.
- Send buyers a link rather than a file. A link cannot go stale in their gallery, and it lets them read the registry themselves, which closes more than a PDF does.
On renders
Not published yet
Renders, if any are ever produced.
We would rather show you nothing than show you something indicative. This space holds the real document as soon as it exists — not a render of what it might look like. Waiting on: Not commissioned.
Ask us where this has got toWe have not commissioned renders and may not. The registry argues that this project can be checked rather than imagined, and a photorealistic image of a building that does not exist yet undermines that on every page it appears.
If you need something visual for a client, use the construction log once it starts. A dated photograph of real work is a stronger sales asset than a render, in a market where every competitor has renders and none have evidence.